<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Virginia Environmental Law Blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://vaenvironmentallaw.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://vaenvironmentallaw.com</link>
	<description>Legal and regulatory issues on Virginia Environmental Law</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Aug 2010 15:36:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on EPA Sediment Limits and Virginia’s “Pollution Diet” Planning by Timothy R. Hughes</title>
		<link>http://vaenvironmentallaw.com/2010/08/18/epa-sediment-limits-and-virginia-pollution-diet/comment-page-1/#comment-22</link>
		<dc:creator>Timothy R. Hughes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Aug 2010 15:36:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vaenvironmentallaw.com/?p=81#comment-22</guid>
		<description>Interesting topic and very nice post Ann.

We had talked about this generally last week:
Stormwater Regulations: Biggest Development Impediment You Have Never Heard Of
http://bit.ly/cCohZu

As soon as I posted it, I got a note from ABC talking about EPA&#039;s decision to withdraw it effluent limitation for further analysis.  I wrote on that today and linked your post:
EPA Withdraws Significant Portion of Storm Water Regulations in Court Case http://bit.ly/9iijoN

It is pretty remarkable how muted discussion regarding this topic has been, especially if NAHB/ABC are even close to correct in their estimates of up to $10 billion annual price tag.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting topic and very nice post Ann.</p>
<p>We had talked about this generally last week:<br />
Stormwater Regulations: Biggest Development Impediment You Have Never Heard Of<br />
<a href="http://bit.ly/cCohZu" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/cCohZu</a></p>
<p>As soon as I posted it, I got a note from ABC talking about EPA&#8217;s decision to withdraw it effluent limitation for further analysis.  I wrote on that today and linked your post:<br />
EPA Withdraws Significant Portion of Storm Water Regulations in Court Case <a href="http://bit.ly/9iijoN" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/9iijoN</a></p>
<p>It is pretty remarkable how muted discussion regarding this topic has been, especially if NAHB/ABC are even close to correct in their estimates of up to $10 billion annual price tag.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on EPA Sets Accountability Framework for Chesapeake Bay cleanup by Len Hnat</title>
		<link>http://vaenvironmentallaw.com/2009/12/31/epa_sets_accountability_framework_for_chesapeake_bay_cleanup/comment-page-1/#comment-17</link>
		<dc:creator>Len Hnat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Mar 2010 19:50:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vaenvironmentallaw.com/?p=48#comment-17</guid>
		<description>Your site is a breath of fresh air when compared to the usual rubbish I study on solar technology.  There&#039;s a lot of scams on the market.  Thank you for helping me out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your site is a breath of fresh air when compared to the usual rubbish I study on solar technology.  There&#8217;s a lot of scams on the market.  Thank you for helping me out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Proposed Stormwater Regs May Not Be Sufficient by Norman Spadafora</title>
		<link>http://vaenvironmentallaw.com/2009/08/12/proposed-stormwater-regs-may-not-be-sufficient/comment-page-1/#comment-15</link>
		<dc:creator>Norman Spadafora</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Mar 2010 19:50:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vaenvironmentallaw.com/?p=26#comment-15</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve enjoyed reading these types of blogs. Exciting stuff! Solar energy has constantly been a fascination with me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve enjoyed reading these types of blogs. Exciting stuff! Solar energy has constantly been a fascination with me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Can We Clean Up the Chesapeake Bay? by Melissa</title>
		<link>http://vaenvironmentallaw.com/2009/09/29/can-we-clean-up-the-chesapeake-bay/comment-page-1/#comment-4</link>
		<dc:creator>Melissa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Feb 2010 03:54:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vaenvironmentallaw.com/?p=32#comment-4</guid>
		<description>I like the site. Cheers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the site. Cheers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Can We Clean Up the Chesapeake Bay? by Duane</title>
		<link>http://vaenvironmentallaw.com/2009/09/29/can-we-clean-up-the-chesapeake-bay/comment-page-1/#comment-3</link>
		<dc:creator>Duane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Feb 2010 03:54:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vaenvironmentallaw.com/?p=32#comment-3</guid>
		<description>greetings, just came across this site.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>greetings, just came across this site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on EPA Sets Accountability Framework for Chesapeake Bay cleanup by grant 360</title>
		<link>http://vaenvironmentallaw.com/2009/12/31/epa_sets_accountability_framework_for_chesapeake_bay_cleanup/comment-page-1/#comment-2</link>
		<dc:creator>grant 360</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 08:24:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vaenvironmentallaw.com/?p=48#comment-2</guid>
		<description>Really great site that you have built good info thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Really great site that you have built good info thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Proposed Stormwater Regs May Not Be Sufficient by Gary Chafin</title>
		<link>http://vaenvironmentallaw.com/2009/08/12/proposed-stormwater-regs-may-not-be-sufficient/comment-page-1/#comment-1</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary Chafin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 13:06:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vaenvironmentallaw.com/?p=26#comment-1</guid>
		<description>On what legal doctrine is current regulation of drainage in Virginia based? Is it the Common Enemy doctrine, the civil law rule, the reasonable use rule or a mixture.  The next question would be whether the new regulations contemplated would affect the legal doctrines currently used?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On what legal doctrine is current regulation of drainage in Virginia based? Is it the Common Enemy doctrine, the civil law rule, the reasonable use rule or a mixture.  The next question would be whether the new regulations contemplated would affect the legal doctrines currently used?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
